In Slow Productivity, Newport argues against the current state of modern work culture, asserting that its relentless pace and constant demands are fundamentally unsustainable. He contends that this approach to work not only diminishes individual well-being but also paradoxically reduces overall productivity and creativity. By examining historical examples, anthropological research, and contemporary workplace dynamics, Newport builds a case for reimagining how work is structured and valued in society.

One of the key ways Newport illustrates the unsustainability of modern work culture is by contrasting it with historical examples of highly productive individuals. He points to renowned scientists and thinkers such as Isaac Newton, Marie Curie, and Galileo, who made groundbreaking discoveries while working at what might be considered a leisurely pace by today’s standards. For instance, Newport notes that:

Copernicus’s revolutionary ideas about planetary motion were sparked by a new commentary [on] Ptolemy published in 1496, which the young astronomer read when he was 23 years old. It wasn’t until 1510, however, that Copernicus got around to writing down his theories in a working draft that he passed around to friends (111).

This example underscores the idea that significant breakthroughs often require extended periods of contemplation and varied intensity of effort, rather than constant, high-pressure work.